On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 at 15:33:41 -0700, Jordan Sissel wrote:
> I am interested in the security concerns here, but are there reliable barriers
> between different processes run by the same user in the same desktop session?
> What is the threat model y'all are defending against?
D-Bus was mentioned e
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Christopher James Halse Rogers <
christopher.halse.rog...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 at 22:31 Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:20:28 +0900
>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:59:43 +0200
Reply below, focusing on use cases for now
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:23:46 +1000
> Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is an RFC for a new interface to generate input events from
arbitrary
> > clients. Note that this is only a
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:23:46 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is an RFC for a new interface to generate input events from arbitrary
> clients. Note that this is only a few days old, so **do not** assume this is
> anything more a thought experiment right now. This email is supposed
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:33:41 -0700 Jordan Sissel said:
> I am interested in the security concerns here, but are there reliable
> barriers between different processes run by the same user in the same
> desktop session? What is the threat model y'all are defending against?
the assumption is a mode
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Jordan Sissel wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Christopher James Halse Rogers <
christopher.halse.rog...@canonical.com> wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 at 22:31 Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:20:28 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wro
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 at 22:31 Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:20:28 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:59:43 +0200 Pekka Paalanen
> said:
> >
> > > > == Authentication/Identification ==
> > > > The goal is to filter clients based on some w
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:31:24 +0300 Pekka Paalanen said:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:20:28 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:59:43 +0200 Pekka Paalanen
> > said:
> >
> > > > == Authentication/Identification ==
> > > > The goal is to filter clients based
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:20:28 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:59:43 +0200 Pekka Paalanen said:
>
> > > == Authentication/Identification ==
> > > The goal is to filter clients based on some white/blacklist, so that e.g.
> > > xdotool can access this interfac
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:23:46 +1000 Peter Hutterer
said:
> Hi all,
>
> This is an RFC for a new interface to generate input events from arbitrary
> clients. Note that this is only a few days old, so **do not** assume this is
> anything more a thought experiment right now. This email is supposed t
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:59:43 +0200 Pekka Paalanen said:
> > == Authentication/Identification ==
> > The goal is to filter clients based on some white/blacklist, so that e.g.
> > xdotool can access this interface but others cannot.
>
> Hi,
>
> if one allows a generic tool that essentially expose
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 11:00 +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:23:46PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >
> > == Authentication/Identification ==
> > The goal is to filter clients based on some white/blacklist, so
> > that e.g.
> > xdotool can access this interface but others can
Hi Peter,
more questions but not necessarily for you to answer - people who want
to make use of the proposed interface should ideally answer most of
these.
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:04:57 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:59:43PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 M
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:59:43PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:23:46 +1000
> Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is an RFC for a new interface to generate input events from arbitrary
> > clients. Note that this is only a few days old, so **do not** assume t
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:23:46 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is an RFC for a new interface to generate input events from arbitrary
> clients. Note that this is only a few days old, so **do not** assume this is
> anything more a thought experiment right now. This email is supposed
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:24 PM Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is an RFC for a new interface to generate input events from arbitrary
> clients. Note that this is only a few days old, so **do not** assume this
> is
> anything more a thought experiment right now. This email is supposed to
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:23:46PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is an RFC for a new interface to generate input events from arbitrary
> clients. Note that this is only a few days old, so **do not** assume this is
> anything more a thought experiment right now. This email is supp
Hi all,
This is an RFC for a new interface to generate input events from arbitrary
clients. Note that this is only a few days old, so **do not** assume this is
anything more a thought experiment right now. This email is supposed to start a
discussion and collection of the various points that need
18 matches
Mail list logo
