On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:06:14 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17 December 2016 at 12:40, Quentin Glidic
> wrote:
> > Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does
> > not survive runtime modifications (like shell locking/unlocking).
> > With this patch, modules
Hi,
On 17 December 2016 at 12:40, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does
> not survive runtime modifications (like shell locking/unlocking).
> With this patch, modules can safely add their own layer at the expected
> position in the stack,
From: Quentin Glidic
Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does
not survive runtime modifications (like shell locking/unlocking).
With this patch, modules can safely add their own layer at the expected
position in the stack, with runtime persistence.
Signed-off-by:
