On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 08:33:16AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30 October 2015 at 04:27, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 08:41:18AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:33:14AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> > Right, so I think we agree here. I'
Hi,
On 30 October 2015 at 04:27, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 08:41:18AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:33:14AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > Right, so I think we agree here. I'd prefer to keep the types matching
>> > as well; I do struggle to see how
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 08:41:18AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:33:14AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 29 October 2015 at 09:25, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:08:11AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > >> On 29 October 2015 at 06:54, J
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:33:14AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29 October 2015 at 09:25, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:08:11AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> On 29 October 2015 at 06:54, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:58:33PM +1000, Peter Hu
Hi,
On 29 October 2015 at 09:25, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:08:11AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 29 October 2015 at 06:54, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:58:33PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> >> mostly thinking aloud here:
>> >> The precision that h
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:08:11AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29 October 2015 at 06:54, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:58:33PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >> mostly thinking aloud here:
> >> The precision that humans can consciously control a mouse with is very
Hi,
On 29 October 2015 at 06:54, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:58:33PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> mostly thinking aloud here:
>> The precision that humans can consciously control a mouse with is very high.
>> Whether 24.8 is insufficient for *us*, I'm not sure.
>> Maybe lea
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:59:02PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Sorry, long delay, but at least fresh eyes :)
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:39:11PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > A wl_relative_pointer object is an extension to the wl_pointer interface
> > only used for emitting relative pointer
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:58:33PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:45:56AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 15 October 2015 at 09:32, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:16:14AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > >> On 15 October 2015 at 04:56, J
Sorry, long delay, but at least fresh eyes :)
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:39:11PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> A wl_relative_pointer object is an extension to the wl_pointer interface
> only used for emitting relative pointer events. It will only emit events
> when the parent pointer has focus.
>
>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:45:56AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15 October 2015 at 09:32, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:16:14AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> On 15 October 2015 at 04:56, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:15:10PM -0500, Derek Fo
Hi,
On 15 October 2015 at 09:32, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:16:14AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 15 October 2015 at 04:56, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:15:10PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
>> >> Perhaps I should read what's in phabricator before I co
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:16:14AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15 October 2015 at 04:56, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:15:10PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
> >> On 07/10/15 07:41 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:32:35PM -0500, Derek Foreman w
Hi,
On 15 October 2015 at 04:56, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:15:10PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
>> On 07/10/15 07:41 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:32:35PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
>> >> Would really like to see Daniel's review, time permitting.
>>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:15:10PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
>
> But if it's a 1000hz gaming mouse the compositor will generate 1000
> events per second for the client to discard?
>
> Why not just allow the pointer to be bound as either/both serial and
> absolute, and have each be a fully funct
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:15:10PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 07/10/15 07:41 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:32:35PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
> >> On 29/07/15 01:39 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> >>> A wl_relative_pointer object is an extension to the wl_pointer interface
>
On 10/08/2015 10:15 AM, Derek Foreman wrote:
On 07/10/15 07:41 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
I think it would be nice to land this in the same release cycle (ie:
this one) as pointer confinement, because I think the two features
really go hand in hand.
Indeed. Relative pointer events are quite usel
On 07/10/15 07:41 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:32:35PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
>> On 29/07/15 01:39 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>>> A wl_relative_pointer object is an extension to the wl_pointer interface
>>> only used for emitting relative pointer events. It will only emit ev
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:32:35PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 29/07/15 01:39 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > A wl_relative_pointer object is an extension to the wl_pointer interface
> > only used for emitting relative pointer events. It will only emit events
> > when the parent pointer has focus.
On 29/07/15 01:39 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> A wl_relative_pointer object is an extension to the wl_pointer interface
> only used for emitting relative pointer events. It will only emit events
> when the parent pointer has focus.
>
> To get a relative pointer object, use the get_relative_pointer req
A wl_relative_pointer object is an extension to the wl_pointer interface
only used for emitting relative pointer events. It will only emit events
when the parent pointer has focus.
To get a relative pointer object, use the get_relative_pointer request
of the global wl_relative_pointer_manager obje
21 matches
Mail list logo
