On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:50:42 -0700
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> mapedness isn't a word ;-)
>
> (Neither is mappedness really... You'll likely need to reword the
> commit title entirely. The third sentence in your commit message is
> probably a good starting point if you can boil it down.)
Hi all
On 30.06.2016 21:50, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> mapedness isn't a word ;-)
>
> (Neither is mappedness really... You'll likely need to reword the
> commit title entirely. The third sentence in your commit message is
> probably a good starting point if you can boil it down.)
>
After a discussion
mapedness isn't a word ;-)
(Neither is mappedness really... You'll likely need to reword the
commit title entirely. The third sentence in your commit message is
probably a good starting point if you can boil it down.)
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:04:28AM +0200, Armin Krezović wrote:
> Currently,
Currently, weston assumes a surface/view is mapped if
it has an output assigned. In a zero outputs scenario,
this isn't really desirable.
This patch introduces a new flag to weston_surface and
weston_view, which has to be set manually to indicate
that a surface/view is mapped.
v2:
- Remove usage
