Re: [PATCH weston v3] libweston: Position layers in an absolute way

2016-12-17 Thread Quentin Glidic
On 05/12/2016 17:00, Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:48:38 +0100 Quentin Glidic wrote: On 05/12/2016 16:29, Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:29:40 +0200 Quentin Glidic wrote: From: Quentin Glidic Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and i

Re: [PATCH weston v3] libweston: Position layers in an absolute way

2016-12-17 Thread Quentin Glidic
On 05/12/2016 16:48, Quentin Glidic wrote: On 05/12/2016 16:29, Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:29:40 +0200 Quentin Glidic wrote: From: Quentin Glidic >>> [snip] + */ +WL_EXPORT void +weston_layer_set_position(struct weston_layer *layer, + enum weston_layer_positi

Re: [PATCH weston v3] libweston: Position layers in an absolute way

2016-12-05 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:48:38 +0100 Quentin Glidic wrote: > On 05/12/2016 16:29, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:29:40 +0200 > > Quentin Glidic wrote: > > > >> From: Quentin Glidic > >> > >> Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does > >> not survi

Re: [PATCH weston v3] libweston: Position layers in an absolute way

2016-12-05 Thread Quentin Glidic
On 05/12/2016 16:29, Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:29:40 +0200 Quentin Glidic wrote: From: Quentin Glidic Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does not survive runtime modifications (like shell locking/unlocking). With this patch, modules can saf

Re: [PATCH weston v3] libweston: Position layers in an absolute way

2016-12-05 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:29:40 +0200 Quentin Glidic wrote: > From: Quentin Glidic > > Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does > not survive runtime modifications (like shell locking/unlocking). > With this patch, modules can safely add their own layer at the expec

Re: [PATCH weston v3] libweston: Position layers in an absolute way

2016-12-05 Thread Giulio Camuffo
2016-07-11 11:29 GMT+02:00 Quentin Glidic : > From: Quentin Glidic > > Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does > not survive runtime modifications (like shell locking/unlocking). > With this patch, modules can safely add their own layer at the expected > position i

Re: [PATCH weston v3] libweston: Position layers in an absolute way

2016-11-21 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Quentin, On 11 July 2016 at 10:29, Quentin Glidic wrote: > Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does > not survive runtime modifications (like shell locking/unlocking). > With this patch, modules can safely add their own layer at the expected > position in the st

[PATCH weston v3] libweston: Position layers in an absolute way

2016-07-11 Thread Quentin Glidic
From: Quentin Glidic Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does not survive runtime modifications (like shell locking/unlocking). With this patch, modules can safely add their own layer at the expected position in the stack, with runtime persistence. Signed-off-by: