Hi,
On 13 July 2015 at 11:26, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:52:32 +0300
> Giulio Camuffo wrote:
>> @@ -3888,9 +3891,15 @@ WL_EXPORT void
>> weston_output_destroy(struct weston_output *output)
>> {
>> struct wl_resource *resource;
>> + struct weston_view *view;
>>
>>
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:52:32 +0300
Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> When an output is being destroyed reassign the output of the views
> that were in it, to be sure not to keep a dangling pointer which could
> be used later on by calling weston_surface_assign_output() on the
> view's surface.
> Also make
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 10:52:32AM +0300, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> When an output is being destroyed reassign the output of the views
> that were in it, to be sure not to keep a dangling pointer which could
> be used later on by calling weston_surface_assign_output() on the
> view's surface.
> Also
When an output is being destroyed reassign the output of the views
that were in it, to be sure not to keep a dangling pointer which could
be used later on by calling weston_surface_assign_output() on the
view's surface.
Also make sure we send wl_surface.leave events to the surfaces that
were in tha
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:40:29PM +0200, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> When an output is destroyed reassign the output of the views that
> were in it, to be sure not to keep a dangling pointer which could
> be used later on by calling weston_surface_assign_output() on the
> view's surface.
Found this p
When an output is destroyed reassign the output of the views that
were in it, to be sure not to keep a dangling pointer which could
be used later on by calling weston_surface_assign_output() on the
view's surface.
---
src/compositor.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/c
