On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Which (non-existing) code are you referring to?
>
> The unresponsive busy cursor thing is triggered in the desktop-shell
> plugin, and the actual busy cursor is set in the desktop-shell client.
> It does not require any setup from the client
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:44:46 +0200
Andre Heider wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it would be hard to spot in the log. Weston already changes the pointer
> > to a busy cursor, when over an unresponsive surface.
> > Did that not work for you, or did y
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it would be hard to spot in the log. Weston already changes the pointer
> to a busy cursor, when over an unresponsive surface.
> Did that not work for you, or did you just miss the connection?
There wasn't yet any code to handle poi
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:07:01 +0200
Andre Heider wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > Without this, it won't get any input anymore.
>
> I noticed this too while fixing up SDL for 0.95. It wasn't obvious why
> input events were not delivered anymore.
> Maybe weston
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Without this, it won't get any input anymore.
I noticed this too while fixing up SDL for 0.95. It wasn't obvious why
input events were not delivered anymore.
Maybe weston should log something about non-responsive client?
__
Without this, it won't get any input anymore.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
---
clients/simple-touch.c | 31 ++-
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clients/simple-touch.c b/clients/simple-touch.c
index 517a956..b438ffa 100644
--- a/clien
