On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:05:58 -0500
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:32:50PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > Struct surface_data was not really useful, and it definitely was not
> > used with EGL-based windows.
> >
> > This also fixes a semantic mistake, where struct shm_sur
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:32:50PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Struct surface_data was not really useful, and it definitely was not
> used with EGL-based windows.
>
> This also fixes a semantic mistake, where struct shm_surface_data was
> put into cairo_surface_t private, but got out as struct
Struct surface_data was not really useful, and it definitely was not
used with EGL-based windows.
This also fixes a semantic mistake, where struct shm_surface_data was
put into cairo_surface_t private, but got out as struct surface_data
instead. Due to struct layout, however, this did not cause a
