On 6 July 2016 at 12:52, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 July 2016 at 13:18, Quentin Glidic
> wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 15:57, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Emil Velikov
>>>
>>> compositor/main.c depends on the header, while the dependency isn't
>>> specified. Thus depending on the order of how th
On 5 July 2016 at 13:18, Quentin Glidic wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 15:57, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> compositor/main.c depends on the header, while the dependency isn't
>> specified. Thus depending on the order of how things are build we could
>> get a build failure.
>>
>> Sig
On 04/07/2016 15:57, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov
compositor/main.c depends on the header, while the dependency isn't
specified. Thus depending on the order of how things are build we could
get a build failure.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
Strictly speaking one could resolve this
From: Emil Velikov
compositor/main.c depends on the header, while the dependency isn't
specified. Thus depending on the order of how things are build we could
get a build failure.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
Strictly speaking one could resolve this (and future) issue, by not
pushing everyth