Re: [PATCH weston 10/68] compositor-drm: Make scanout view preparation more stringent

2017-01-27 Thread Derek Foreman
On 27/01/17 08:30 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: Hi, On 27 January 2017 at 14:25, Derek Foreman wrote: On 09/12/16 01:57 PM, Daniel Stone wrote: +static int +drm_view_transform_supported(struct weston_view *ev) +{ + return !ev->transform.enabled || + (ev->transform.matrix.type <

Re: [PATCH weston 10/68] compositor-drm: Make scanout view preparation more stringent

2017-01-27 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 27 January 2017 at 14:25, Derek Foreman wrote: > On 09/12/16 01:57 PM, Daniel Stone wrote: >> +static int >> +drm_view_transform_supported(struct weston_view *ev) >> +{ >> + return !ev->transform.enabled || >> + (ev->transform.matrix.type < >> WESTON_MATRIX_TRANSFORM_RO

Re: [PATCH weston 10/68] compositor-drm: Make scanout view preparation more stringent

2017-01-27 Thread Derek Foreman
On 09/12/16 01:57 PM, Daniel Stone wrote: Don't import buffers which span multiple outputs, short-cut any attempt to import SHM buffers, and ignore buffers with a global alpha set. I'm not convinced all of these conditions entirely make sense, but this at least makes them equally nonsensical. S

[PATCH weston 10/68] compositor-drm: Make scanout view preparation more stringent

2016-12-09 Thread Daniel Stone
Don't import buffers which span multiple outputs, short-cut any attempt to import SHM buffers, and ignore buffers with a global alpha set. I'm not convinced all of these conditions entirely make sense, but this at least makes them equally nonsensical. Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone Differential Re