On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:56:47 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14 February 2017 at 14:09, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:18:01 +
> > Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> +ZUC_TEST(timespec_test, timespec_add_nsec)
> >> +{
> >> + struct timespec a, r;
> >
> > An array and
Hi,
On 14 February 2017 at 14:09, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:18:01 +
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>> +ZUC_TEST(timespec_test, timespec_add_nsec)
>> +{
>> + struct timespec a, r;
>
> An array and a loop to ease readability? :-)
I had a flash of doing this, and remembered why
Hi,
On 14 February 2017 at 15:02, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:21:17 +
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 14 February 2017 at 14:09, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:18:01 +
>> > Daniel Stone wrote:
>> >> +static inline void
>> >> +timespec_add_nsec(struct t
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:21:17 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14 February 2017 at 14:09, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:18:01 +
> > Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> Add a (timespec) = (timespec) + (nsec) helper, to save intermediate
> >> conversions to nanoseconds in its
Hi,
On 14 February 2017 at 14:09, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:18:01 +
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>> Add a (timespec) = (timespec) + (nsec) helper, to save intermediate
>> conversions to nanoseconds in its users.
>
> I recall some comments about using timespec over int64_t nanos
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:18:01 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Add a (timespec) = (timespec) + (nsec) helper, to save intermediate
> conversions to nanoseconds in its users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
Hi,
I recall some comments about using timespec over int64_t nanoseconds
being over-engineeri
Add a (timespec) = (timespec) + (nsec) helper, to save intermediate
conversions to nanoseconds in its users.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
---
Makefile.am| 10
shared/timespec-util.h | 21 +
tests/timespec-test.c | 126 +
