On Fri, 13 May 2016 11:03:07 +0200
Benoit Gschwind wrote:
> Hello Pekka,
>
> as-is you get my:
> Reviewed-by: Benoit Gschwind
> Tested-by: Benoit Gschwind
>
> But I have comments that may be worth to read :)
>
> On 10/05/2016 16:11, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > From: Pekka Paalanen
> >
> > Pr
Hello Pekka,
as-is you get my:
Reviewed-by: Benoit Gschwind
Tested-by: Benoit Gschwind
But I have comments that may be worth to read :)
On 10/05/2016 16:11, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> Print pointer frames only if any pointer related events are printed
> first.
>
> This
On May 10, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> Print pointer frames only if any pointer related events are printed
> first.
>
> This avoids flooding the output with "pointer frame" just because of
> motion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
A suggestion rega
On May 10, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> Print pointer frames only if any pointer related events are printed
> first.
>
> This avoids flooding the output with "pointer frame" just because of
> motion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
Makes sense, even
From: Pekka Paalanen
Print pointer frames only if any pointer related events are printed
first.
This avoids flooding the output with "pointer frame" just because of
motion.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
---
clients/eventdemo.c | 26 ++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)