On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> this raised a couple of thoughts, inline below.
>
>
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:33:36 +0100
> Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
>> Instead of having one global workspace container, have one container per
>> output. This means that every outp
Hi Jonas,
this raised a couple of thoughts, inline below.
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:33:36 +0100
Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> Instead of having one global workspace container, have one container per
> output. This means that every output will have its own set of workspaces
> with its own workspace state.
Instead of having one global workspace container, have one container per
output. This means that every output will have its own set of workspaces
with its own workspace state.
New surfaces are added to the current workspace on the container of the
output the surface was positioned at.
The workspa
