: Freitag, 22. Dezember 2017 16:12
> To: Pekka Paalanen
> Cc: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB); wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Teyfel,
> Michael (ADITG/ESB)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 00/14] Desktop Protocol Support for IVI-Shell
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen
>
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:01:09 -0600
> Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
>> Hi Pekka,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
>> wrote:
>> > Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor.
>> > Because it is violating w
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:01:09 -0600
Matt Hoosier wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
> wrote:
> > Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor.
> > Because it is violating wayland protocol by not supporting wl_shell
> > interface.
> >
> >
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> On 11/7/17 6:01 PM, Matt Hoosier wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pekka,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor.
>>> Because it is violating wayland protoc
On 11/7/17 6:01 PM, Matt Hoosier wrote:
Hi Pekka,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
wrote:
Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor.
Because it is violating wayland protocol by not supporting wl_shell
interface.
The wl_shell protocol was designed fo
Hi Pekka,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
wrote:
> Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor. Because it is
> violating wayland protocol by not supporting wl_shell interface.
>
> Therefore, we have to at least support wl_shell interface in ivi-shell. Wh
: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB); wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 00/14] Desktop Protocol Support for IVI-Shell
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:08:19 -0500
Matt Hoosier wrote:
> I'm not at all familiar with the internal implementation of ivi-shell,
> so I can&
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the very reason why ivi-shell ever came to be was that the operating
> environment of graphical applications in IVI was so different from a
> normal desktop, that it was simply impossible to have desktop
> applications work in a mea
nal Message-
> > > From: wayland-devel [mailto:wayland-devel-
> > > boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Michael Teyfel
> > > Sent: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017 12:02
> > > To: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH weston 00/14]
...@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Hoosier
Sent: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 16:09
To: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Teyfel, Michael (ADITG/ESB)
Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 00/14] Desktop Protocol Support for IVI-Shell
I'm not at all familiar with the int
2:02
> > To: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: [PATCH weston 00/14] Desktop Protocol Support for IVI-Shell
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > since some time I’m working on ivi-shell to add xdg-protocol support by
> > means of libweston-desktop.
f Michael Teyfel
> Sent: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017 12:02
> To: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [PATCH weston 00/14] Desktop Protocol Support for IVI-Shell
>
> Hello all,
>
> since some time I’m working on ivi-shell to add xdg-protocol support by
> means of lib
Hello all,
since some time I’m working on ivi-shell to add xdg-protocol support by means
of libweston-desktop. Due to my changes both xdg-protocol applications and
ivi-shell / ivi-application-protocol applications are supported within
ivi-shell now. The known functionality is preserved and just
13 matches
Mail list logo
