Hi all,
we will come up with a new solution, at clarify what needs to be standardized
and why.
Regards
Michael.
>> Hi Michael-san,
>>
>> As Pekka and Jason suggests in feedback, shall we clearly explain two
>> topics before stepping in details. - what ivi-shell tries to
>> standardizes - why i
On Sep 13, 2013 8:35 AM, "nobuhiko_tanibata" <
nobuhiko_tanib...@xddp.denso.co.jp> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael-san,
>
> As Pekka and Jason suggests in feedback, shall we clearly explain two
topics before stepping in details.
> - what ivi-shell tries to standardizes
> - why ivi-controller tries to conrol
Hi Michael-san,
As Pekka and Jason suggests in feedback, shall we clearly explain two
topics before stepping in details.
- what ivi-shell tries to standardizes
- why ivi-controller tries to conrol surfaces and layers in separated
process from a compositor.
@Pekka and Jason,
Thank you for man
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:13:06 +
wrote:
> Hi Jason, Tanibata-san
>
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > Thank you very much for feedback.
> >
> >> Michale & Nobuhiko,
> >>
> >> First of all, thank you for the clarification and thank you for
> >> sending this to the list and being willing to work with the
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 08:01:51 +
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> let me give some technical background on the extension, and why we
> have decided to design the first approach of the extensions like it
> is published from Tanibata-san. In general, we would like to get the
> feedback on the extensions, to
p 9, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Nobuhiko Tanibata
wrote:
ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote on o: "nobuhiko_tanibata"
:
Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 0/6] ivi-shell proposal
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 00:13:55 +0900
nobuhiko_tanibata
wrote:
2013-09-06 19:16 に Pekka Paalanen さんは書きました:
On Fri, 6 Sep
isplay
> contoller doesn't support it, next is compositor.
Here I am full inline with the post from Tanibata-san
Regards
Michael.
>> Once again, thank you for mailing the list. I hope my thoughts above
>> are helpful and can clear a few things up.
>> Thanks,
>> --J
13 at 7:59 PM, Nobuhiko Tanibata
wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Pekka Paalanen"
To: "nobuhiko_tanibata"
Cc: "Nobuhiko Tanibata" ;
;
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 0/6] ivi-shell proposal
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 00:13
-06 19:16 に Pekka Paalanen さんは書きました:
>>> > On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 08:39:24 +0900
>>> > "Nobuhiko Tanibata"
>>> > >
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> - Original Message -
>>> >> From: "Pekka Paalanen&qu
- Original Message -
From: "Pekka Paalanen"
To: "nobuhiko_tanibata"
Cc: "Nobuhiko Tanibata" ;
;
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 0/6] ivi-shell proposal
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 00:13:55 +0900
nobuhiko_tanibata wro
Hi all,
let me give some technical background on the extension, and why we have decided
to design the
first approach of the extensions like it is published from Tanibata-san.
In general, we would like to get the feedback on the extensions, to get it
fitting in the FOSS approach,
fulfilling the i
"
> >> To: "Nobuhiko Tanibata"
> >> Cc: ;
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:02 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 0/6] ivi-shell proposal
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 09:08:26 +0900
&g
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 08:39:24 +0900
"Nobuhiko Tanibata" wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pekka Paalanen"
> To: "Nobuhiko Tanibata"
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 0/6] ivi-shel
- Original Message -
From: "Pekka Paalanen"
To: "Nobuhiko Tanibata"
Cc: ;
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 0/6] ivi-shell proposal
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 09:08:26 +0900
"Nobuhiko Tanibata" wrote:
Hi,
This series i
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 09:08:26 +0900
"Nobuhiko Tanibata" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series implements ivi-shell to fulfill use cases of In-Vehicle
> Infotainment, IVI. Such use cases are well overviewed in a project;
> Genivi IVI layer management.
> http://projects.genivi.org/ivi-layer-management/node/
/6] ivi-shell proposal
Hi,
Overall I like that genivi is now a lot more accessible/visible from the
outside. I understand the necessity of dealing with layers on a lower level
to make use of the efficient blending of display controllers. But that logic
should be only implemented within the
; securitych...@denso.co.jp
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 0/6] ivi-shell proposal
Hi,
this is interesting but why didn't you choose to write a shell plugin?
Personally I don't think this should be merged in Weston master, since it's
out of Wes
Hi,
Overall I like that genivi is now a lot more accessible/visible from the
outside. I understand the necessity of dealing with layers on a lower level
to make use of the efficient blending of display controllers. But that
logic should be only implemented within the compositor. Clients should not
Hi,
this is interesting but why didn't you choose to write a shell plugin?
Personally I don't think this should be merged in Weston master, since it's
out of Weston scope afaik.
Having a plugin gives you much more freedom in what to do, and you can have
your own release cycle.
2013/9/4 Nobuhiko
Hi,
This series implements ivi-shell to fulfill use cases of In-Vehicle
Infotainment, IVI. Such use cases are well overviewed in a project; Genivi
IVI layer management.
http://projects.genivi.org/ivi-layer-management/node/13
A motivation of this series and basis idea are introduced by Ossama at
20 matches
Mail list logo
