Hi,
On 22 March 2015 at 17:14, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> Now that we've removed the XYToWindow handler in Xwayland, we actually
> have to stack windows properly. This stacks windows on top when
> activating them.
>
> Note that for a fully robust Xwayland implementation, we'll need a
> complete s
I can't really comment on the code aside that it looks fine for a not
X-savy eye, but it works fine with the xwayland change to remove the
xwl_xy_to_window thingy.
2015-03-22 19:14 GMT+02:00 Jasper St. Pierre :
> Now that we've removed the XYToWindow handler in Xwayland, we actually
> have to stac
Now that we've removed the XYToWindow handler in Xwayland, we actually
have to stack windows properly. This stacks windows on top when
activating them.
Note that for a fully robust Xwayland implementation, we'll need a
complete stack tracker implementation, unfortunately.
---
xwayland/window-mana
