On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:06:52 -0500
Derek Foreman wrote:
> Oops, I spoke too soon...
>
> On 25/06/15 09:01 AM, Derek Foreman wrote:
> > On 24/06/15 08:28 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >> From: Pekka Paalanen
> >>
> >> We used to rely on the order in which the
> >> weston_compositor::destroy_signal
On 24/06/15 08:28 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> We used to rely on the order in which the
> weston_compositor::destroy_signal callbacks happened, to not access
> freed memory. Don't know when, but this broke at least with ivi-shell,
> which caused crashes in random places o
Oops, I spoke too soon...
On 25/06/15 09:01 AM, Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 24/06/15 08:28 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>> From: Pekka Paalanen
>>
>> We used to rely on the order in which the
>> weston_compositor::destroy_signal callbacks happened, to not access
>> freed memory. Don't know when, but t
From: Pekka Paalanen
We used to rely on the order in which the
weston_compositor::destroy_signal callbacks happened, to not access
freed memory. Don't know when, but this broke at least with ivi-shell,
which caused crashes in random places on compositor shutdown.
Valgrind found the following: