On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:24:42PM +0200, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> Nowhere in Weston. But i thought it was the accepted policy to not have
> around links not initted. But if it not it's no problem.
No, it depends on the link. In some cases we want to be able to
remove a link without worrying about
Nowhere in Weston. But i thought it was the accepted policy to not have
around links not initted. But if it not it's no problem.
Giulio
2013/4/4 Kristian Høgsberg
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:08:22PM +0200, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> > ---
> > src/compositor.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insert
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:08:22PM +0200, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> ---
> src/compositor.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
When is this needed? I don't think we rely on layer_link being valid
when a surface is not mapped (not in any layer).
Kristian
> diff --git a/src/compositor.c b/src/
---
src/compositor.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/compositor.c b/src/compositor.c
index 3645b04..88f083c 100644
--- a/src/compositor.c
+++ b/src/compositor.c
@@ -977,6 +977,7 @@ weston_surface_unmap(struct weston_surface *surface)
weston_surface_damage_below(surf
