To be honest, I don't think I looked at the other backends too much when
writing the wayland backend. I guess cleaning up myself seemed like a good
idea at the time. I don't think it really matters; having it in shutdown
just lets backends be lazy.
--Jason
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Pekka
On Fri, 23 May 2014 10:03:00 +0300
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2014 09:20:02 -0700
> "U. Artie Eoff" wrote:
>
> > wl_list_for_each dereference's output to increment the
> > next iteration of the loop. However, output is free'd
> > inside the loop resulting in a dereference to free'd
On Wed, 21 May 2014 09:20:02 -0700
"U. Artie Eoff" wrote:
> wl_list_for_each dereference's output to increment the
> next iteration of the loop. However, output is free'd
> inside the loop resulting in a dereference to free'd
> memory.
>
> Use wl_list_for_each_safe instead, which is designed to
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:20:02AM -0700, U. Artie Eoff wrote:
> wl_list_for_each dereference's output to increment the
> next iteration of the loop. However, output is free'd
> inside the loop resulting in a dereference to free'd
> memory.
>
> Use wl_list_for_each_safe instead, which is designed
wl_list_for_each dereference's output to increment the
next iteration of the loop. However, output is free'd
inside the loop resulting in a dereference to free'd
memory.
Use wl_list_for_each_safe instead, which is designed to
handle this kind of pattern.
Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff
---
src/co
