On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:08:55 -0700
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:18:48AM -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> > zuctest is another clock_gettime() user that fails to link against librt
> > when
> > necessary.
> >
> > Instead of adding another -lrt LDADD entry i've opted for t
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:18:48AM -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> zuctest is another clock_gettime() user that fails to link against librt when
> necessary.
>
> Instead of adding another -lrt LDADD entry i've opted for the saner way and
> converted the check to a configure test that will set CLO
zuctest is another clock_gettime() user that fails to link against librt when
necessary.
Instead of adding another -lrt LDADD entry i've opted for the saner way and
converted the check to a configure test that will set CLOCK_GETTIME_LIBS
appropiately and replaced all instances of -lrt with it.
Bui