On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
>
>
> On 08/20/2014 03:06 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:04:54 -0700
>> Bill Spitzak wrote:
>>
>
> Destroying the last protocol object for the role does not remove the
>>> role, correct? The client can recreate a new p
On 08/20/2014 03:06 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:04:54 -0700
Bill Spitzak wrote:
Destroying the last protocol object for the role does not remove the
role, correct? The client can recreate a new protocol object for that
role and it still works?
Recreating the same role
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:26:44 +0300
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:16:34 -0700
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > Pekka,
> > I have one nitpick below. However, if we can't find a good solution, I'm
> > ok with pushing as-is.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
> >
> >
> > On Tue,
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:16:34 -0700
Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Pekka,
> I have one nitpick below. However, if we can't find a good solution, I'm
> ok with pushing as-is.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:29
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:04:54 -0700
Bill Spitzak wrote:
> On 08/19/2014 12:29 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > + Often, this
> > + request also creates a new protocol object that represents the
> > + role and adds additional functionality to wl_surface. When a
> > + client want
On 08/19/2014 12:29 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
+ Often, this
+ request also creates a new protocol object that represents the
+ role and adds additional functionality to wl_surface. When a
+ client wants to destroy a wl_surface, they must destroy this 'role
+ object' befo
Pekka,
I have one nitpick below. However, if we can't find a good solution, I'm
ok with pushing as-is.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:29:21 +0300
> Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > From: Pekka Paalanen
> >
> > Define w
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:29:21 +0300
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> Define what a role is, and what restrictions there are.
>
> A change to existing behaviour is that a role cannot be changed at all
> once set. However, this is unlikely to cause problems, as there is no
> reaso
From: Pekka Paalanen
Define what a role is, and what restrictions there are.
A change to existing behaviour is that a role cannot be changed at all
once set. However, this is unlikely to cause problems, as there is no
reason to re-use wl_surfaces in clients.
v2: give more concrete examples of r
