On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 07:33:01 -0600
Derek Foreman wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 04:49, Ray, Ian (GE Healthcare) wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 11.28, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > >
> > > Going once, going twice...
> > >
> > > Any objections? More acks?
>
> Acked-by: Derek Foreman
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 04:49, Ray, Ian (GE Healthcare) wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 6 Mar 2019, at 11.28, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >
> > Going once, going twice...
> >
> > Any objections? More acks?
Acked-by: Derek Foreman
Personally, I really see no harm in pushing this during code freeze,
since it's no
> On 6 Mar 2019, at 11.28, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> Going once, going twice...
>
> Any objections? More acks?
>
> Let's say I'll push this and enable MRs on Friday if there are no
> further comments. More acks and I might do it sooner. :-)
>
>
LGTM
Acked-by: Ian Ray
> Thanks,
> pq
>
On 27/02/19 11:35 pm, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
From: Pekka Paalanen
The experience from Weston shows that the Gitlab merge request based workflow
works really well. Recently there have also been issues with the mailing list
that have made the email based workflow more painful than it used to be. T
Going once, going twice...
Any objections? More acks?
Let's say I'll push this and enable MRs on Friday if there are no
further comments. More acks and I might do it sooner. :-)
Thanks,
pq
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:35:09 +0200
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> The experience f
From: Pekka Paalanen
The experience from Weston shows that the Gitlab merge request based workflow
works really well. Recently there have also been issues with the mailing list
that have made the email based workflow more painful than it used to be. Those
issues might have been temporary or occas
