On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:53:03 +0200
Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> 2014-11-12 13:46 GMT+02:00 Marek Chalupa :
> >
> >
> > On 7 November 2014 21:26, Giulio Camuffo
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm a bit confused here... you remove the alarm() calls but not the
> >> signal handler or the sigaction setting.
> >
>
2014-11-12 13:46 GMT+02:00 Marek Chalupa :
>
>
> On 7 November 2014 21:26, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
>>
>> I'm a bit confused here... you remove the alarm() calls but not the
>> signal handler or the sigaction setting.
>
>
> The alarm worked with default action - that is kill the process. There were
>
On 7 November 2014 21:26, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> I'm a bit confused here... you remove the alarm() calls but not the
> signal handler or the sigaction setting.
The alarm worked with default action - that is kill the process. There were
no signal handler or sigaction setting before.
When test f
I'm a bit confused here... you remove the alarm() calls but not the
signal handler or the sigaction setting. On the other hand, in the
patch introducing test_set_timeout() you add a new SIGALRM handler...
Am i missing something?
--
Giulio
2014-09-24 15:37 GMT+03:00 Marek Chalupa :
> replace ca
replace call to alarm() with test_set_timeout()
Signed-off-by: Marek Chalupa
---
tests/display-test.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/display-test.c b/tests/display-test.c
index a1e45b1..8435d60 100644
--- a/tests/display-test.c
+++ b/tests/displ
