On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:10:09PM -0700, Scott Moreau wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Bill Spitzak
> wrote:
> >
> > > Scott Moreau wrote:
> > >
> > > Because resize-from-center depends on knowing what edge was actually
> >
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:10:09PM -0700, Scott Moreau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
>
> > Scott Moreau wrote:
> >
> > Because resize-from-center depends on knowing what edge was actually
> >> clicked on, setting both left and right bits simultaneously means that
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> Scott Moreau wrote:
>
> Because resize-from-center depends on knowing what edge was actually
>> clicked on, setting both left and right bits simultaneously means that both
>> left and right cases will be hit, and whichever sets the offset l
Scott Moreau wrote:
Because resize-from-center depends on knowing what edge was actually
clicked on, setting both left and right bits simultaneously means that
both left and right cases will be hit, and whichever sets the offset
last, wins.
You should be able to tell "which" edge by what sid
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Scott Moreau wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:38:54PM -0700, Scott Moreau wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Scott Moreau wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:5
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:38:54PM -0700, Scott Moreau wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Scott Moreau wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Bill Spitzak
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> A scheme I have seen is to
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:38:54PM -0700, Scott Moreau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Scott Moreau wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> >
> >> A scheme I have seen is to use 15 (ie all 4 edge flags or'd) for
> >> center-resize. This makes it pos
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Scott Moreau wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
>
>> A scheme I have seen is to use 15 (ie all 4 edge flags or'd) for
>> center-resize. This makes it possible to add 6 (left | right) for "center
>> resize horizontally" and 3 (top |
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> Scott Moreau wrote:
>
> Now that you mention it, I believe I have seen this used somewhere too
>> and it makes sense. As a side note, the algorithm is always the same for
>> resize-from-center regardless if it's horizontal, vertical or both.
Scott Moreau wrote:
Now that you mention it, I believe I have seen this used somewhere too
and it makes sense. As a side note, the algorithm is always the same for
resize-from-center regardless if it's horizontal, vertical or both.
I was imagining "resize from center horizontal" would only mo
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> A scheme I have seen is to use 15 (ie all 4 edge flags or'd) for
> center-resize. This makes it possible to add 6 (left | right) for "center
> resize horizontally" and 3 (top | bottom) for "center resize vertically".
>
> The only values from
A scheme I have seen is to use 15 (ie all 4 edge flags or'd) for
center-resize. This makes it possible to add 6 (left | right) for
"center resize horizontally" and 3 (top | bottom) for "center resize
vertically".
The only values from 1-15 that have no meaning are when 3 edges are
selected.
---
v2:
No changes.
protocol/wayland.xml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/protocol/wayland.xml b/protocol/wayland.xml
index 4205dae..25fc3ae 100644
--- a/protocol/wayland.xml
+++ b/protocol/wayland.xml
@@ -551,6 +551,7 @@
+
--
1.7.
13 matches
Mail list logo
