Re: [PATCH wayland-web v2] qt5: fixed bug tracker link

2016-11-21 Thread Samuel Gaist
> On 21 nov. 2016, at 11:55, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Hi, > > On 9 October 2016 at 21:04, Samuel Gaist wrote: >>> On 31 août 2016, at 17:13, Yong Bakos wrote: >>> On Aug 30, 2016, at 11:50 PM, Samuel Gaist wrote: No being used to the by email patch workflow, should I send an updated >>>

Re: [PATCH wayland-web v2] qt5: fixed bug tracker link

2016-11-21 Thread Samuel Gaist
> On 21 nov. 2016, at 12:11, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Hi Samuel, > > On 21 November 2016 at 11:08, Samuel Gaist wrote: >>> On 21 nov. 2016, at 11:55, Daniel Stone wrote: >>> Very much overlooked indeed; sorry for the delay. Pushed now. >> >> Thank you very much ! >> >> Can you also take a lo

Re: [PATCH wayland-web v2] qt5: fixed bug tracker link

2016-11-21 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Samuel, On 21 November 2016 at 11:08, Samuel Gaist wrote: >> On 21 nov. 2016, at 11:55, Daniel Stone wrote: >> Very much overlooked indeed; sorry for the delay. Pushed now. > > Thank you very much ! > > Can you also take a look at: > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2016

Re: [PATCH wayland-web v2] qt5: fixed bug tracker link

2016-11-21 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 9 October 2016 at 21:04, Samuel Gaist wrote: >> On 31 août 2016, at 17:13, Yong Bakos wrote: >> On Aug 30, 2016, at 11:50 PM, Samuel Gaist wrote: >>> No being used to the by email patch workflow, should I send an updated >>> patch with the “Reviewed-by” field added ? >> >> Samuel, not n

Re: [PATCH wayland-web v2] qt5: fixed bug tracker link

2016-10-09 Thread Samuel Gaist
> On 31 août 2016, at 17:13, Yong Bakos wrote: > > On Aug 30, 2016, at 11:50 PM, Samuel Gaist wrote: >> >> No being used to the by email patch workflow, should I send an updated patch >> with the “Reviewed-by” field added ? >> >> Cheers >> >> Samuel > > Samuel, not necessary. Committers wi

Re: [PATCH wayland-web v2] qt5: fixed bug tracker link

2016-08-31 Thread Yong Bakos
On Aug 30, 2016, at 11:50 PM, Samuel Gaist wrote: > > No being used to the by email patch workflow, should I send an updated patch > with the “Reviewed-by” field added ? > > Cheers > > Samuel Samuel, not necessary. Committers will add the R-b line when applying your patch. Not sure why the

Re: [PATCH wayland-web v2] qt5: fixed bug tracker link

2016-08-30 Thread Samuel Gaist
No being used to the by email patch workflow, should I send an updated patch with the “Reviewed-by” field added ? Cheers Samuel > On 12 août 2016, at 00:03, Yong Bakos wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Samuel Gaist wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Gaist > > Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos

Re: [PATCH wayland-web v2] qt5: fixed bug tracker link

2016-08-11 Thread Yong Bakos
On Aug 9, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Samuel Gaist wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Gaist Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos yong > --- > qt5.html | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/qt5.html b/qt5.html > index 752d63b..d67e297 100644 > --- a/qt5.html > +++ b/qt5.html > @@

[PATCH wayland-web v2] qt5: fixed bug tracker link

2016-08-09 Thread Samuel Gaist
Signed-off-by: Samuel Gaist --- qt5.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/qt5.html b/qt5.html index 752d63b..d67e297 100644 --- a/qt5.html +++ b/qt5.html @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ and for wl_surface: Known issues -See the https://bugreports.qt-project.org/s