Re: [PATCH wayland-web] FAQ: do not mention GPL

2017-02-24 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 07:57:58AM -0800, Yong Bakos wrote: > Hi Pekka, > > > On Feb 23, 2017, at 7:32 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > > From: Pekka Paalanen > > > > I could not find what the "some example code" could be. There is > > certainly nothing GPL in Wayland or Weston repositories. >

Re: [PATCH wayland-web] FAQ: do not mention GPL

2017-02-23 Thread Yong Bakos
Hi Pekka, > On Feb 23, 2017, at 7:32 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > From: Pekka Paalanen > > I could not find what the "some example code" could be. There is > certainly nothing GPL in Wayland or Weston repositories. > > I hear having GPL mentioned in the FAQ has raised some questions with > l

Re: [PATCH wayland-web] FAQ: do not mention GPL

2017-02-23 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:32:52 +0200 Pekka Paalanen wrote: > From: Pekka Paalanen > > I could not find what the "some example code" could be. There is > certainly nothing GPL in Wayland or Weston repositories. > > I hear having GPL mentioned in the FAQ has raised some questions with > lawyers, t

[PATCH wayland-web] FAQ: do not mention GPL

2017-02-23 Thread Pekka Paalanen
From: Pekka Paalanen I could not find what the "some example code" could be. There is certainly nothing GPL in Wayland or Weston repositories. I hear having GPL mentioned in the FAQ has raised some questions with lawyers, too. It's just misleading. While at it, make it more clear which MIT lice