Hi,
On 5 January 2016 at 01:10, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:09:16PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 04:00:33PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > My only concern with this is that, as Peter said, it could be
>> > potentially difficult to correlate the two
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:09:16PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 04:00:33PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > On 17 November 2015 at 10:09, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > +
> > > +
> > > + [...]
> > > +
> > > + Relative motions are not coupl
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 04:00:33PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On 17 November 2015 at 10:09, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > +
> > +
> > + [...]
> > +
> > + Relative motions are not coupled to wl_pointer.motion events, and
> > can be
> > + sent in combination wi
Hi Jonas,
On 17 November 2015 at 10:09, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> +
> +
> + [...]
> +
> + Relative motions are not coupled to wl_pointer.motion events, and can
> be
> + sent in combination with such events, but also independently. There
> may
> + also be scenarious
Hi,
On 24 November 2015 at 06:39, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>> > Meh. This just spells out what weston does, and then asks clients not to
>> > rely on it. Spelling it out that it might work I suspect will just
>> > confuse users.
>>
>> I'm aware of that, but the important bit here is that *it spells it
On 24 November 2015 at 00:21, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> bad. in X we had cases where a client would run multiple versions of the
> same protocol (the toolkit would support XI2.0, a toolkit plugin XI2.2). I
> don't know whether that's likely to happen in wayland, but generally you
> cannot define the
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:24:20PM -0600, Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 17/11/15 04:09 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > The wp_relative_pointer interface is an extension to the wl_pointer
> > interface created from wl_seat. It has the same focus, but adds the
> > functionality of sending relative pointer mot
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:11:26PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:44:54AM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:21:45AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:01:01PM -0600, Derek Foreman wrote:
> > > > On 23/11/15 12:32 AM, Jonas
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:44:54AM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:21:45AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:01:01PM -0600, Derek Foreman wrote:
> > > On 23/11/15 12:32 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:42:09PM +1000, Peter Hu
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:21:45AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:01:01PM -0600, Derek Foreman wrote:
> > On 23/11/15 12:32 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:42:09PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:59:50PM +0800, Jonas
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:01:01PM -0600, Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 23/11/15 12:32 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:42:09PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:59:50PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> >> [...]
> > +
> > +
> > +
> >>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:01:01PM -0600, Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 23/11/15 12:32 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:42:09PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:59:50PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> >> [...]
> > +
> > +
> > +
> >>
Hi,
On 17 November 2015 at 11:09, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> The wp_relative_pointer interface is an extension to the wl_pointer
> interface created from wl_seat. It has the same focus, but adds the
> functionality of sending relative pointer motions unhindered by
> constraints such as monitor edges o
On 23/11/15 03:24 PM, Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 17/11/15 04:09 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>> The wp_relative_pointer interface is an extension to the wl_pointer
>> interface created from wl_seat. It has the same focus, but adds the
>> functionality of sending relative pointer motions unhindered by
>> c
On 17/11/15 04:09 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> The wp_relative_pointer interface is an extension to the wl_pointer
> interface created from wl_seat. It has the same focus, but adds the
> functionality of sending relative pointer motions unhindered by
> constraints such as monitor edges or other barrier
On 23/11/15 12:32 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:42:09PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:59:50PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>> [...]
> +
> +
> +
> +
Should we add something about pairing this with wl_seat capabil
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:42:09PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:59:50PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> [...]
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Should we add something about pairing this with wl_seat capabilities here?
> > > Just looking at
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:59:50PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
[...]
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +
> >
> > Should we add something about pairing this with wl_seat capabilities here?
> > Just looking at this protocol doesn't make it clear what happens if the
> > compositor drops the w
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:09:48AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:09:17PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > The wp_relative_pointer interface is an extension to the wl_pointer
> > interface created from wl_seat. It has the same focus, but adds the
> > functionality of sending
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:09:17PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> The wp_relative_pointer interface is an extension to the wl_pointer
> interface created from wl_seat. It has the same focus, but adds the
> functionality of sending relative pointer motions unhindered by
> constraints such as monitor ed
The wp_relative_pointer interface is an extension to the wl_pointer
interface created from wl_seat. It has the same focus, but adds the
functionality of sending relative pointer motions unhindered by
constraints such as monitor edges or other barriers. It also contains
unaccelerated pointer motion
21 matches
Mail list logo
