On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 06:38:00PM +0100, David Edmundson wrote:
> >
> > For flipping, it's a bit more non straight forward, as
> > flipping and the offset are not very useful in combination,
> >
>
> Yes, I think it's only when flipped where we need some additional
> clarification.
>
>
> > How a
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:30:49PM +0100, David Edmundson wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> > I suggest continuing talking about "direction" here. An alternative to
> > the above could be, changing the original text just a bit:
> >
>
> The thing I struggled with when trying to first understand v6 i
>
> For flipping, it's a bit more non straight forward, as
> flipping and the offset are not very useful in combination,
>
Yes, I think it's only when flipped where we need some additional
clarification.
> How about we add the following paragraph to the flip_x/y descriptions:
>
> The a
>
> >
>
>
> I suggest continuing talking about "direction" here. An alternative to
> the above could be, changing the original text just a bit:
>
The thing I struggled with when trying to first understand v6 is that
"bottom" isn't a direction, it's a position.
I've changed it in a way that s
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:54:34PM +0100, David Edmundson wrote:
> You missed a line in "xdg-shell/positioner: Allow empty anchor_rect"
> You might want to squash this with that.
> From 0a21378302d63a83a10723b41adf35e605fb35f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Edmundson
> Date: Tue, 20 J
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:55:41PM +0100, David Edmundson wrote:
>
> From 093ed1a17a483792e316f932e15a566ab2653838 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Edmundson
> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:51:45 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] xdg-shell/positioner: Replace edge bitfield with extended
> enum
>
From 093ed1a17a483792e316f932e15a566ab2653838 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Edmundson
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:51:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] xdg-shell/positioner: Replace edge bitfield with extended
enum
Bitfields allowed for impossible combinations of anchor edges, such as
being on
You missed a line in "xdg-shell/positioner: Allow empty anchor_rect"
You might want to squash this with that.
From 0a21378302d63a83a10723b41adf35e605fb35f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Edmundson
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:29:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix xdg-shell/positioner: Allow
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:54:31AM +0100, David Edmundson wrote:
> I have some comments/questions on the current v6 interface which I'd like
> clarifying before we make it stable.
>
> The Positioner anchor and gravity both takes the edge as a bitfield of
> flags.
>
> It's then part of the protoco
I have some comments/questions on the current v6 interface which I'd like
clarifying before we make it stable.
The Positioner anchor and gravity both takes the edge as a bitfield of
flags.
It's then part of the protocol to say "If two parallel anchor edges are
specified (e.g. 'left' and 'right'),
Hi Jonas,
Regarding renaming,
> On May 24, 2017, at 2:35 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it is time to take the next step regarding xdg_shell: declaring it
> stable. The current unstable version (xdg_shell unstable v6) has been
> implemented in multiple code bases, used by multiple d
Hi,
I think it is time to take the next step regarding xdg_shell: declaring it
stable. The current unstable version (xdg_shell unstable v6) has been
implemented in multiple code bases, used by multiple desktop environments for
quite some time, and I think this proves it is time to take the next st
12 matches
Mail list logo
