On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 12:41:44 +
"Victor Berger" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 30 août 2019 14:18 "Daniel Stone" a écrit:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 08:45, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >
> >> I don't recall hearing much from people with custom code generating
> >> scanners, so until we upset
Hi,
30 août 2019 14:18 "Daniel Stone" a écrit:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 08:45, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
>> I don't recall hearing much from people with custom code generating
>> scanners, so until we upset someone and they come to us complaining
>> about regressions the first time, I am
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 08:45, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:49:37 + Simon Ser wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:43 PM, Victor Berger
> > wrote:
> > > I can't talk for other projects, but in the case of wayland-rs this
> > > kind of corrections to the protocol fi
On Friday, August 30, 2019 10:45 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:49:37 +
> Simon Ser cont...@emersion.fr wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:43 PM, Victor Berger victor.ber...@m4x.org
> > wrote:
> >
> > > 20 août 2019 13:30 "Simon Ser" cont...@emersion.fr a écrit:
>
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:49:37 +
Simon Ser wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:43 PM, Victor Berger
> wrote:
> > 20 août 2019 13:30 "Simon Ser" cont...@emersion.fr a écrit:
> >
> > > So now the question is: some scanners may have generated some code from
> > > presentation-time.xml. Some
On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:43 PM, Victor Berger
wrote:
> 20 août 2019 13:30 "Simon Ser" cont...@emersion.fr a écrit:
>
> > So now the question is: some scanners may have generated some code from
> > presentation-time.xml. Some scanners may generate different code for
> > bitfields, maybe break
20 août 2019 13:30 "Simon Ser" a écrit:
> So now the question is: some scanners may have generated some code from
> presentation-time.xml. Some scanners may generate different code for
> bitfields, maybe breaking ABI. Is it fine to add the bitfield
> attribute?
>
> For instance, wayland-rs seems
On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:20 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:48:40AM +, Simon Ser wrote:
>
> > That's a good catch.
> > However I don't know if this can be considered backwards-compatible.
> > For wayland-scanner it doesn't make a difference, but what about other
> > s
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:48:40AM +, Simon Ser wrote:
> That's a good catch.
>
> However I don't know if this can be considered backwards-compatible.
> For wayland-scanner it doesn't make a difference, but what about other
> scanners?
I don't think it's reasonable to avoid using any new XML
That's a good catch.
However I don't know if this can be considered backwards-compatible.
For wayland-scanner it doesn't make a difference, but what about other
scanners?
The commit introducing bitfields in the DTD predates presentation-time.
commit e65aed46168fc86a7e78db071472278ea533f526
Autho
---
stable/presentation-time/presentation-time.xml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/stable/presentation-time/presentation-time.xml
b/stable/presentation-time/presentation-time.xml
index a46994c..6063c53 100644
--- a/stable/presentation-time/presentation-time.xml
11 matches
Mail list logo
