On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Mariusz Ceier wrote:
> I think both patches (and original code too obviously) are wrong -
> WL_DISPLAY_ERROR (opcode 0) event has signature "ous", so Quentin
> patch calls event with too many arguments and ignores types, and Marek
> patch calls event with too few ar
I think both patches (and original code too obviously) are wrong -
WL_DISPLAY_ERROR (opcode 0) event has signature "ous", so Quentin
patch calls event with too many arguments and ignores types, and Marek
patch calls event with too few arguments and incorrect type for the
second argument.
Imo, corre
The call is wrong, I posted it here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2013-November/012141.html
But without any reaction. Good that somobody else renewed it :)
On 05/01/2014, Quentin Glidic wrote:
> From: Quentin Glidic
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Glidic
> ---
>
> I do not kno
From: Quentin Glidic
Signed-off-by: Quentin Glidic
---
I do not know if this call is wrong of this the test just reveals a bug but
without this, the wl_resource_post_event_array is called with random values
tests/resources-test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --g
