Hi,
On 5 December 2017 at 14:08, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 4 December 2017 at 21:47, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> Any comments on Quentin's suggestion here? Would they be enough for you?
>
> I fear that the ship has sailed long time ago and there will be
> practically zero users of this.
>
> AFAICT peo
On 4 December 2017 at 21:47, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Jussi, Tomek, Emil,
>
> On 18 August 2017 at 10:36, Quentin Glidic
> wrote:
>> On 8/18/17 11:30 AM, Quentin Glidic wrote:
>>> Projects have been using various ways to check for the wayland-scanner,
>>> mostly based on their developper own use cas
On 5 December 2017 at 13:15, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
> I've added Ross and Fabien, who've been looking at this for Yocto.
>
> On 18 August 2017 at 10:30, Quentin Glidic
> wrote:
> > --- a/wayland-scanner.m4
> > +++ b/wayland-scanner.m4
> > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> > +#serial 2
>
> I don't qui
Hi Quentin,
I've added Ross and Fabien, who've been looking at this for Yocto.
On 18 August 2017 at 10:30, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> --- a/wayland-scanner.m4
> +++ b/wayland-scanner.m4
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +#serial 2
I don't quite understand the significance of this.
> +# WL_PROG_WAYLAND_SCANNER()
Jussi, Tomek, Emil,
On 18 August 2017 at 10:36, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> On 8/18/17 11:30 AM, Quentin Glidic wrote:
>> Projects have been using various ways to check for the wayland-scanner,
>> mostly based on their developper own use case, and often not allowing
>> others use cases to work withou
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:36:17 +0200
Quentin Glidic wrote:
> On 8/18/17 11:30 AM, Quentin Glidic wrote:
> > From: Quentin Glidic
> >
> > Projects have been using various ways to check for the wayland-scanner,
> > mostly based on their developper own use case, and often not allowing
> > others use
On 8/18/17 11:30 AM, Quentin Glidic wrote:
From: Quentin Glidic
Projects have been using various ways to check for the wayland-scanner,
mostly based on their developper own use case, and often not allowing
others use cases to work without a workaround.
Hopefully this macro will support all use
From: Quentin Glidic
Projects have been using various ways to check for the wayland-scanner,
mostly based on their developper own use case, and often not allowing
others use cases to work without a workaround.
Hopefully this macro will support all use cases without needing user
action.
Signed-o