Re: [PATCH wayland] protocol: Clarify the meaning of NULL buffer attachment

2017-02-15 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:15:23 -0600 Derek Foreman wrote: > On 14/02/17 06:05 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:06:24 -0600 > > Derek Foreman wrote: > > > >> This documents what has apparently been the case for ages - attaching a > >> NULL > >> buffer does *not* always remove

Re: [PATCH wayland] protocol: Clarify the meaning of NULL buffer attachment

2017-02-14 Thread Derek Foreman
On 14/02/17 06:05 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:06:24 -0600 Derek Foreman wrote: This documents what has apparently been the case for ages - attaching a NULL buffer does *not* always remove the surface content, rather it has behaviour determined by the surface role (which ma

Re: [PATCH wayland] protocol: Clarify the meaning of NULL buffer attachment

2017-02-14 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:06:24 -0600 Derek Foreman wrote: > This documents what has apparently been the case for ages - attaching a NULL > buffer does *not* always remove the surface content, rather it has behaviour > determined by the surface role (which may be documented elsewhere). > > Signed-o

[PATCH wayland] protocol: Clarify the meaning of NULL buffer attachment

2017-02-13 Thread Derek Foreman
This documents what has apparently been the case for ages - attaching a NULL buffer does *not* always remove the surface content, rather it has behaviour determined by the surface role (which may be documented elsewhere). Signed-off-by: Derek Foreman --- protocol/wayland.xml | 13 +++--