On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:33:45AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 15:55:37 +0800
> Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> > Change wording to be more consistent with other parts of the subsurface
> > protocol. Before this change, wl_subsurface.set_position explicitly
> > stated that the new s
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 15:55:37 +0800
Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> Change wording to be more consistent with other parts of the subsurface
> protocol. Before this change, wl_subsurface.set_position explicitly
> stated that the new state was to be applied on the parents
> wl_surface.commit and wl_subsurface.
Change wording to be more consistent with other parts of the subsurface
protocol. Before this change, wl_subsurface.set_position explicitly
stated that the new state was to be applied on the parents
wl_surface.commit and wl_subsurface.place_above/below only said "on
the next commit of the parent su
