I think it would be a pain to do that, and might not be clear for wl_seat
and wl_data_device. If you believe in it, all power to you.
On 22 Sep 2014 02:10, "Pekka Paalanen" wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:59:51 +0300
> Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:48:02 -0700
> > Jason Ekst
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:59:51 +0300
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:48:02 -0700
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > As I mentioned on IRC, I don't really like adding and using an enum value
> > without bumping protocol version. However, the only time we ever use it is
> > to kill the c
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:48:02 -0700
Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> As I mentioned on IRC, I don't really like adding and using an enum value
> without bumping protocol version. However, the only time we ever use it is
> to kill the client so the worst thing that can happen is that the client
> doesn't r
As I mentioned on IRC, I don't really like adding and using an enum value
without bumping protocol version. However, the only time we ever use it is
to kill the client so the worst thing that can happen is that the client
doesn't report the error correctly. I think I'm ok with it.
--Jason Ekstran
This will be used by implementations to send out errors if clients try
to set roles on surfaces that already have roles.
---
protocol/wayland.xml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/protocol/wayland.xml b/protocol/wayland.xml
index bb457bc..f6eb54d 100644
--- a/protocol/wayland.xml
