Hi Emil,
Thanks for the review!
On 10 February 2017 at 19:51, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 10 February 2017 at 17:43, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> +static bool
>> +drm_device_is_kms(struct drm_backend *b, struct udev_device *device)
>> +{
>> + [...]
>> +
>> + b->drm.fd = fd;
>> + b->drm.
Hi Daniel,
Not a huge expert on this code, so take the following with a grain of salt.
On 10 February 2017 at 17:43, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Given that we can have render-only devices, or vgem in a class of its
> own, ignore any non-KMS devices in compositor-drm's device selection.
> For x86 platf
Given that we can have render-only devices, or vgem in a class of its
own, ignore any non-KMS devices in compositor-drm's device selection.
For x86 platforms, this is mostly a non-issue since we look at the udev
boot_vga issue, but other architectures which lack this, and have
multiple KMS devices
