On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:12:54AM -0800, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> Again I don't understand why you think it is important to include all this
> confusing text.
>
> If I am not mistaken, *some* compositors less than version 5 do *NOT* act
> in the old way.
>
> Therefore no client can rely on this beh
On 06/12/15 11:43 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Also applies to touch/keyboard
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
Thanks for fixing this.
Reviewed-by: Derek Foreman
> ---
> Changes to v1:
> - reword the paragraph detailing the pre v5 behaviour
>
> protocol/wayland.xml | 33
Hi,
On 7 December 2015 at 18:12, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> Again I don't understand why you think it is important to include all this
> confusing text.
>
> If I am not mistaken, *some* compositors less than version 5 do *NOT* act in
> the old way.
>
> Therefore no client can rely on this behaviour ev
Again I don't understand why you think it is important to include all this
confusing text.
If I am not mistaken, *some* compositors less than version 5 do *NOT* act
in the old way.
Therefore no client can rely on this behaviour even if the compositor is
less than verison 5. And people writing com
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:43:35PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Also applies to touch/keyboard
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
Looks good to me now, so consider this Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl
Jonas
> ---
> Changes to v1:
> - reword the paragraph detailing the pre v5 behaviour
>
> protoc
Also applies to touch/keyboard
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
Changes to v1:
- reword the paragraph detailing the pre v5 behaviour
protocol/wayland.xml | 33 ++---
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/protocol/wayland.xml b/protocol/wayla
