On 04/20/2012 12:02 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:12:14 -0300
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
It was silently accepting "-i=3", "-i=3/2", "--idle-time=*3" and similar
unwanted type of arguments, not changing anything internally; this
gives the wrong impression for the user. Now it exp
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:12:14 -0300
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> It was silently accepting "-i=3", "-i=3/2", "--idle-time=*3" and similar
> unwanted type of arguments, not changing anything internally; this
> gives the wrong impression for the user. Now it explicitly warns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiago Vi
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:12:14 -0300
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> It was silently accepting "-i=3", "-i=3/2", "--idle-time=*3" and similar
> unwanted type of arguments, not changing anything internally; this
> gives the wrong impression for the user. Now it explicitly warns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiago Vi
It was silently accepting "-i=3", "-i=3/2", "--idle-time=*3" and similar
unwanted type of arguments, not changing anything internally; this
gives the wrong impression for the user. Now it explicitly warns.
Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti
---
Pekka, I guess now it's alright, please take a look. If i