On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:58:11PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> The protocol does not require us to flush_damage() on wl_buffer
> destruction. In fact, by the time the server receives this request, the
> client may have already clobbered the buffer's storage, so we could be
> reading undefined da
The protocol does not require us to flush_damage() on wl_buffer
destruction. In fact, by the time the server receives this request, the
client may have already clobbered the buffer's storage, so we could be
reading undefined data. Instead, just forget about the buffer. The
protocol already says, th
