On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:19:22 -0600
Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 05/12/14 07:49 PM, Ondřej Majerech wrote:
> > load_modules currently ignores errors signalled by both
> > weston_load_module and module_init, and instead always returns 0. Its
> > return value appears to be checked in callers, so we mos
On 09/12/14 12:29 PM, Ondřej Majerech wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:19:22 -0600
> Derek Foreman wrote:
>
>> On 05/12/14 07:49 PM, Ondřej Majerech wrote:
>>> load_modules currently ignores errors signalled by both
>>> weston_load_module and module_init, and instead always returns 0.
>>> Its retu
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:19:22 -0600
Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 05/12/14 07:49 PM, Ondřej Majerech wrote:
> > load_modules currently ignores errors signalled by both
> > weston_load_module and module_init, and instead always returns 0.
> > Its return value appears to be checked in callers, so we mos
On 05/12/14 07:49 PM, Ondřej Majerech wrote:
> load_modules currently ignores errors signalled by both
> weston_load_module and module_init, and instead always returns 0. Its
> return value appears to be checked in callers, so we most likely want to
> propagate any errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ondře
load_modules currently ignores errors signalled by both
weston_load_module and module_init, and instead always returns 0. Its
return value appears to be checked in callers, so we most likely want to
propagate any errors.
Signed-off-by: Ondřej Majerech
---
src/compositor.c | 6 --
1 file chan
