On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:19:28PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:48:55 +0200
> Marek Chalupa wrote:
>
> > bad-buffer-test is FAIL_TEST and every assert() (or even SIGSEGV signal)
> > make it pass. It shouldn't be so for example when assert() is invoked
> > when a client co
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:48:55 +0200
Marek Chalupa wrote:
> bad-buffer-test is FAIL_TEST and every assert() (or even SIGSEGV signal)
> make it pass. It shouldn't be so for example when assert() is invoked
> when a client couldn't connect to display.
>
> Make sure that only relevant asserts make th
It would be a lot simpler to only change the sighandler when you want it
to fail, and reverse the type of test to be a success test?
On 04/11/2014 02:48 AM, Marek Chalupa wrote:
bad-buffer-test is FAIL_TEST and every assert() (or even SIGSEGV signal)
make it pass. It shouldn't be so for example
bad-buffer-test is FAIL_TEST and every assert() (or even SIGSEGV signal)
make it pass. It shouldn't be so for example when assert() is invoked
when a client couldn't connect to display.
Make sure that only relevant asserts make the test pass
and the other make it fail (by returning 0)
---
tests/b