On 08/10/2014 10:39 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:27:07PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
We could also drop the mask and generate 'pressed' events when adding a
device; can we do that reliably without risking a race condition?
technically yes, but I'm not sure it is a good
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:27:07PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 03:23:32PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:28:30PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > When removing a device, its not guaranteed that all button or key
> > > presses have been released, r
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 03:23:32PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:28:30PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > When removing a device, its not guaranteed that all button or key
> > presses have been released, resulting in an invalid seat wide button
> > count.
> >
> > Note that
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:28:30PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> When removing a device, its not guaranteed that all button or key
> presses have been released, resulting in an invalid seat wide button
> count.
>
> Note that kernel devices normally will send release events when being
> unplugged, bu
When removing a device, its not guaranteed that all button or key
presses have been released, resulting in an invalid seat wide button
count.
Note that kernel devices normally will send release events when being
unplugged, but this won't happen when removing a device from the path
backend.
Signed
