On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:28:26PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 02:28:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Move scanning for a suitable touch to be the pointer to tp_process_state
> > and take tp_button_touch_active into account.
> >
> > Note this adds a tp_touch_active h
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 02:28:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Move scanning for a suitable touch to be the pointer to tp_process_state
> and take tp_button_touch_active into account.
>
> Note this adds a tp_touch_active helper since we want to do the same checks in
> other places too (ie to see
Move scanning for a suitable touch to be the pointer to tp_process_state
and take tp_button_touch_active into account.
Note this adds a tp_touch_active helper since we want to do the same checks in
other places too (ie to see if a finger should count for 2 finger scrolling).
Signed-off-by: Hans d
