On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:38:07AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05-06-15 08:41, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >Previous expansion had side-effects when litest_log was called in an if
> >condition without {}
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
>
> The entire set looks good to me:
>
> Revi
Hi,
On 05-06-15 08:41, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Previous expansion had side-effects when litest_log was called in an if
condition without {}
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
The entire set looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede
Regards,
Hans
---
test/litest.c | 4 ++--
1 file chang
Previous expansion had side-effects when litest_log was called in an if
condition without {}
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
test/litest.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/litest.c b/test/litest.c
index c9c17d0..0e2cb96 100644
--- a/test/litest.c
+++