Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 10:53 +1000, Peter Hutterer a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:31:39PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Le lundi 24 avril 2017 à 16:11 +1000, Peter Hutterer a écrit :
> > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:31:56PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > > Some devices do not
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:31:39PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le lundi 24 avril 2017 à 16:11 +1000, Peter Hutterer a écrit :
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:31:56PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > Some devices do not use dmi at all (this is the case on most non-x86
> > > platforms, such
Le lundi 24 avril 2017 à 16:11 +1000, Peter Hutterer a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:31:56PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Some devices do not use dmi at all (this is the case on most non-x86
> > platforms, such as arm and arm64) but should able to select specific
> > quirks based on t
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:31:56PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Some devices do not use dmi at all (this is the case on most non-x86
> platforms, such as arm and arm64) but should able to select specific
> quirks based on the input device name too.
>
> This adds name-based input device detect
Some devices do not use dmi at all (this is the case on most non-x86
platforms, such as arm and arm64) but should able to select specific
quirks based on the input device name too.
This adds name-based input device detection without dmi to support
these devices.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski
