Re: [PATCH libinput 01/10] Replace pointer acceleration with a much simpler linear one

2014-09-21 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:09:58AM +0100, Steven Newbury wrote: > On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 15:44 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > We ran a userstudy, evaluating three different accel methods. > > Detailed results are > > available at: > > > http://www.who-t.net/publications/hutterer2014_libinput_ptr

Re: [PATCH libinput 01/10] Replace pointer acceleration with a much simpler linear one

2014-09-19 Thread Steven Newbury
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 15:44 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > We ran a userstudy, evaluating three different accel methods. > Detailed results are > available at: > http://www.who-t.net/publications/hutterer2014_libinput_ptraccel_study.pdf > > We found that there was little difference between the m

[PATCH libinput 01/10] Replace pointer acceleration with a much simpler linear one

2014-09-18 Thread Peter Hutterer
We ran a userstudy, evaluating three different accel methods. Detailed results are available at: http://www.who-t.net/publications/hutterer2014_libinput_ptraccel_study.pdf We found that there was little difference between the method we had in libinput 0.6 and this three-line function. Users didn'