Re: [PATCH libinput 0/1] Fix debouncing algorithm

2017-11-08 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:26:11PM +0100, Vicente Bergas wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Peter Hutterer > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:34:01AM +0100, Vicente Bergas wrote: > ... > >> I hope it is fixed, but not been able to run the test-suite. > >> Please, can you

Re: [PATCH libinput 0/1] Fix debouncing algorithm

2017-11-07 Thread Vicente Bergas
Hi Peter, On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:34:01AM +0100, Vicente Bergas wrote: ... >> I hope it is fixed, but not been able to run the test-suite. >> Please, can you confirm if the new test-suite passes? > > running the full test suite should be

Re: [PATCH libinput 0/1] Fix debouncing algorithm

2017-11-01 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:34:01AM +0100, Vicente Bergas wrote: > Hi Peter, > > >Hi Vicente > > > >sorry about the delay, too many things on right now. > > Thank you for taking the time to review the patch. > > >... > >Note: the current algorithm does ignore spurious actions, at least after the

[PATCH libinput 0/1] Fix debouncing algorithm

2017-11-01 Thread Vicente Bergas
Hi Peter, >Hi Vicente > >sorry about the delay, too many things on right now. Thank you for taking the time to review the patch. >... >Note: the current algorithm does ignore spurious actions, at least after the >very first one. AIUI it's not that uncommon either when the contacts are >wobbly. S