On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:24:41AM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 29/04/15 08:33 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> > ---
> > I admit, I'm not sure of the effect it has leaving the data sitting there.
> > timerfd_create states that only the value read changes, not the
On 29/04/15 08:33 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> ---
> I admit, I'm not sure of the effect it has leaving the data sitting there.
> timerfd_create states that only the value read changes, not the actual size
> of the data (which I couldn't reproduce in a quick test, it
Hi,
On 30-04-15 03:33, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
It seems this is the right thing todo:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede
Regards,
Hans
---
I admit, I'm not sure of the effect it has leaving the data sitting there.
timerfd_create states that only the value read chan
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
I admit, I'm not sure of the effect it has leaving the data sitting there.
timerfd_create states that only the value read changes, not the actual size
of the data (which I couldn't reproduce in a quick test, it's always 1)
epoll sounds like it should keep triggeri
