Re: [PATCH 2/2] xdg-shell: Make sure wording reflects expectations

2018-02-27 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
Hi, This seems like a reasonable direction for a change, though I would suggest a slightly different approach. For all cases where it reads "the compositor will respond by emitting", instead change to something like "if the compositor decides to apply this state change then it will respond by emit

[PATCH 2/2] xdg-shell: Make sure wording reflects expectations

2018-02-27 Thread wl
From: Markus Ongyerth The wording in xdg-shell `set_*` requests implies the compositor *will* react to requests. This would give clients the control over its state, while they should just be able to kindly ask for a state change. This makes sure the language reflects that and changes "will" to "m