Re: [PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2015-01-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:31:52AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:41:52 +0100 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 02:26:00PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:44:49 +0100 > > > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > > > But as long as yo

Re: [PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2015-01-20 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:41:52 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 02:26:00PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:44:49 +0100 > > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > But as long as you don't do crazy things the drm dma-buf import will > > > notice that it's the sam

Re: [PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2015-01-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 02:26:00PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:44:49 +0100 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:45:22PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:25:09 +0100 > > > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014

Re: [PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2015-01-08 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:44:49 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:45:22PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:25:09 +0100 > > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:02PM -0500, Louis-Francis > > > Ratté-Boulianne wrote: > > > > From: P

Re: [PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2015-01-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:45:22PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:25:09 +0100 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:02PM -0500, Louis-Francis > > Ratté-Boulianne wrote: > > > From: Pekka Paalanen > > > > > > An experimental (hence the 'z' prefix) linu

Re: [PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2014-12-18 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:25:09 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:02PM -0500, Louis-Francis > Ratté-Boulianne wrote: > > From: Pekka Paalanen > > > > An experimental (hence the 'z' prefix) linux_dmabuf Wayland protocol > > extension for creating dmabuf-based wl_buffers in

Re: [PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2014-12-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:02PM -0500, Louis-Francis Ratté-Boulianne wrote: > From: Pekka Paalanen > > An experimental (hence the 'z' prefix) linux_dmabuf Wayland protocol > extension for creating dmabuf-based wl_buffers in a generic manner. > > This does not include proper dmabuf metadata ne

Re: [PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2014-12-17 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:19:53 -0800 Bill Spitzak wrote: > It looks like the purpose of "dmabuf_batch" is to send a more complex > set of arguments to the dmabuf::create_buffer request. This is a > variable-sized list of fd's, each containing a variable-sized list of > planes. The Wayland protoc

Re: [PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2014-12-16 Thread Bill Spitzak
It looks like the purpose of "dmabuf_batch" is to send a more complex set of arguments to the dmabuf::create_buffer request. This is a variable-sized list of fd's, each containing a variable-sized list of planes. The Wayland protocol does not have a method of passing this as a request argument,

[PATCH 1/7] protocol: add linux_dmabuf extension RFCv1

2014-12-12 Thread Louis-Francis Ratté-Boulianne
From: Pekka Paalanen An experimental (hence the 'z' prefix) linux_dmabuf Wayland protocol extension for creating dmabuf-based wl_buffers in a generic manner. This does not include proper dmabuf metadata negotiation because there is no way to communicate all dmabuf constraints from the compositor