Re: [PATCH 1/3] clients: Moving and rotating transient surfaces

2015-10-06 Thread Derek Foreman
Hmm, I landed this one but shouldn't have - we require signed-off-by for commits. Could you re-send your other two with Signed-off-by? Thanks, Derek On 06/10/15 11:48 AM, Ben Hummon wrote: > Transient surfaces use child/parent surfaces for stacking order. This > change resloves an issue in whic

Re: [PATCH 1/3] clients: Moving and rotating transient surfaces

2015-10-06 Thread Derek Foreman
On 06/10/15 11:48 AM, Ben Hummon wrote: > Transient surfaces use child/parent surfaces for stacking order. This > change resloves an issue in which attempting to move or rotate a > toplevel transient surface can move or rotate its ancestor. > --- This fixes an issue I introduced when trying to sto

[PATCH 1/3] clients: Moving and rotating transient surfaces

2015-10-06 Thread Ben Hummon
Transient surfaces use child/parent surfaces for stacking order. This change resloves an issue in which attempting to move or rotate a toplevel transient surface can move or rotate its ancestor. --- The moving/rotating issue can be seen by creating transient surfaces in the weston stacking demo.